Changes by: Aleksey Nogin (nogin at cs.caltech.edu)
Date: 2006-02-24 18:49:31 -0800 (Fri, 24 Feb 2006)
Revision: 8785
Log message:
Some helper lemmas for the elimination proof. Unfortunately the
step_union_logic_elim rule is not provable as is - we either need a bunch of
extra wf conditions (which would be unfortunate), or we need to strengthen the
SimpleStep definition to include those wf conditions (which is my current
plan).
Changes | Path |
+19 -0 | metaprl/theories/itt/reflection/experimental/itt_hoas_proof_ind.ml |
+523 -35 | metaprl/theories/itt/reflection/experimental/itt_hoas_proof_ind.prla |